Alternatives

12 Best OmniFocus Alternatives

Ruud CarisEditor at ToolGuideLast updated: January 5, 2026About OmniFocus →

OmniFocus is the undisputed king of complexity, but that learning curve and price tag break many people. Sometimes you just want to check off tasks without having to play database architect first. These alternatives offer structure without needing a 100-page manual.

158 tools comparedNo sponsored rankings

My recommendations

Best overallThings 34.3/5

Best balance between design and functionality on Apple

View Things 3 →
Most similarAmazing Marvin4.3/5

Just as much depth and customization options as OmniFocus

View Amazing Marvin →
Best for teamsTodoist4.6/5

Cross-platform collaboration where OmniFocus fails

View Todoist →
Best for power usersObsidian4.6/5

For those who want to build their own system

View Obsidian →

At a glance

Sort by
ToolRatingFromBest for
1Things 34.3/5·Apple purists who prefer design over complexityView →
2Todoist4.6/5$ 5/moPeople who work on a mix of Windows and AppleView →
3Amazing Marvin4.3/5$ 8/moProductivity nerds who want to build their own methodView →
4TickTick4.5/5$ 3/moStudents and freelancers on a limited budgetView →
5Nozbe0.0/5$ 8/moSmall teams that want to use the GTD method togetherView →
6Akiflow4.3/5$ 19/moBusy managers who live from their calendarView →
7Noteplan4.5/5$ 8.33/moPeople who think and plan in plain textView →
8Microsoft To Do4.3/5FreeOffice 365 users looking for simplicityView →
9Linear4.5/5$ 8/moDevelopers and designers who find OmniFocus too slowView →
10Remember The Milk0.0/5$ 4.17/moLinux/Windows users who need Smart ListsView →
11Obsidian4.6/5$ 4/moTinkerers who want to merge notes and tasksView →
12Superlist3.9/5$ 5/moUsers who miss Wunderlist and want something modernView →

All alternatives to OmniFocus, one by one

Things 3

Apple purists who prefer design over complexity

4.3/5

Things 3 is the aesthetic counterpart to the spreadsheet mentality of OmniFocus. Where OmniFocus forces you into micromanagement, Things lets you breathe with white space and animations. It's exclusive to Apple, just like its big competitor, but feels completely different in use. Fans swear by the design; it's an app you actually *want* to open instead of have to. But be warned: if you live on complex custom perspectives or heavy automation scripts, you're going to miss those here. It's task management without the administrative hassle, but sometimes that hassle is exactly what you need to maintain control over chaos.

Difference from OmniFocus: Minimalist interface that hides complexity instead of showing it

Choose this if: visual calm is more important than filter options

What I like

  • One-time purchase instead of the expensive OmniFocus subscription
  • Interface is much less intimidating for new users
  • Headers in projects work more smoothly than OmniFocus action groups

What I like less

  • Lacks the Review mode that makes OmniFocus unique
  • No attachments or images to paste directly into tasks

Todoist

People who work on a mix of Windows and Apple

4.6/5 · Free plan · From $ 5/mo

Todoist is the standard choice if you want to break out of the Apple ecosystem. The biggest advantage over OmniFocus is the Natural Language Processing. You type 'meeting Friday 2pm #work' and it's immediately set correctly. In OmniFocus you'd still be clicking through menus. It works everywhere: Windows, Android, Web. The interface is clean, but lacks the deep hierarchy of OmniFocus. For collaboration it's superior, because OmniFocus is fundamentally a solo tool. The downside is that sub-tasks in Todoist sometimes feel messy and don't nest as tightly as you're used to.

Difference from OmniFocus: Superior task input via natural language recognition

Choose this if: want to share tasks with colleagues or family

What I like

  • Works on any device, not just Apple hardware
  • Collaborating on lists is built-in, not impossible
  • Task input is much faster through smart text recognition

What I like less

  • No Start Dates (only deadlines), a major omission for GTD
  • Custom filters are less granular than OmniFocus perspectives

Amazing Marvin

Productivity nerds who want to build their own method

4.3/5 · From $ 8/mo

If you use OmniFocus because you like tinkering with your system, Amazing Marvin is your new playground. This isn't a standard task list, but a toolbox with which you build your own workflow. Want GTD? Turn on the feature. Want Eisenhower Matrix? Click it on. It's the only tool that beats OmniFocus in terms of customizability. The flip side is feature fatigue: you can configure so much that you spend more time setting up the app than on your work. The interface is more playful and less business-like than the gray lists of OmniFocus, which takes some getting used to for some people.

Difference from OmniFocus: Modular structure where you can toggle features on/off

Choose this if: OmniFocus feels too rigid for your specific workflow

What I like

  • Built-in time-tracking and pomodoro (missing in OmniFocus)
  • Gamification options to make boring work more fun
  • Cross-platform web version that works identically to desktop

What I like less

  • Mobile app is slower and less 'native' than OmniFocus
  • Enormous amount of options can be paralyzing

TickTick

Students and freelancers on a limited budget

4.5/5 · Free plan · From $ 3/mo

TickTick is often underestimated as a simple to-do app, but it's secretly a powerhouse. It combines tasks with a full-fledged calendar view, something you always need a second app for in OmniFocus. The 'Pomo Timer' and habit tracker are just baked in. It's much cheaper than OmniFocus and works on all platforms. The interface, however, is less polished; it sometimes feels a bit utilitarian and cluttered with all the features crammed in. If you're looking for one app that replaces 80% of your productivity stack, you're in good hands here.

Difference from OmniFocus: All-in-one: tasks, calendar, habits and focus timer

Choose this if: want to do time-blocking directly in your task list

What I like

  • Built-in calendar view to schedule tasks directly
  • Much cheaper subscription than the OmniGroup prices
  • Habit tracker makes separate apps obsolete

What I like less

  • Privacy policy and data storage in China sometimes raises questions
  • Less robust support for complex project dependencies

Nozbe

Small teams that want to use the GTD method together

0.0/5 · Free plan · From $ 8/mo

Nozbe is built by GTD disciples, and you can tell in everything. The structure of Projects, Contexts and Next Actions is directly recognizable for an OmniFocus refugee. The big difference? Nozbe is 'task-based communication'. It's designed to not just keep tasks to yourself, but to share them with a team without becoming a clunky project management tool. The interface is functional but won't win any beauty contests; it feels a bit outdated compared to Things or Superlist. But for pure GTD implementation in a small team, it's one of the few serious options.

Difference from OmniFocus: GTD structure but built for teams

Choose this if: want to maintain OmniFocus structure but need to collaborate

What I like

  • Focus on 'Incoming' works just like the OmniFocus Inbox
  • Easily delegate tasks to team members
  • Works entirely in the browser, no installation needed

What I like less

  • Interface feels dated and less 'snappy'
  • Missing the advanced review perspectives of OmniFocus

Akiflow

Busy managers who live from their calendar

4.3/5 · From $ 19/mo

Akiflow takes a different approach: it doesn't try to replace OmniFocus, but to collect all your tasks from other apps (Slack, Gmail, Asana). It's a command center. Where in OmniFocus you have to manually enter everything or use scripts, Akiflow pulls it in for you. The focus is heavily on 'Time Blocking' in your calendar. It's expensive, comparable to OmniFocus, but saves time through consolidation. However, it's less suitable for deep project planning with hundreds of subtasks; for that, the database structure of OmniFocus remains superior. Akiflow is for doers, not for planners.

Difference from OmniFocus: Consolidates tasks from other apps into one timeline

Choose this if: your calendar is leading for your daily planning

What I like

  • Direct integration with Slack and Gmail without scripts
  • Command bar works faster than OmniFocus Quick Entry
  • Visually plan tasks in your calendar (Time Blocking)

What I like less

  • Not suitable for complex project hierarchies
  • Price is steep for a 'layer' on top of other apps

Noteplan

People who think and plan in plain text

4.5/5 · From $ 8.33/mo

NotePlan is the salvation for people who find OmniFocus too rigid and prefer to work in text files. It combines Markdown notes with a calendar. Every day is a note. You type your tasks, and they appear in your calendar. It's 'Bullet Journaling' but digital. The data is stored locally on your device (just like OmniFocus), but in open text files that you can always read. It lacks the strict 'Review' workflow, but offers much more freedom to write context and thoughts with your tasks. No database, just text.

Difference from OmniFocus: Combines long-form notes directly with tasks

Choose this if: you find context and notes more important than filters

What I like

  • You fully own your data (local text files)
  • Bullet Journal method is directly applicable
  • Great integration between notes and calendar

What I like less

  • No native 'perspectives' to filter tasks
  • Learning curve if you're not familiar with Markdown

Microsoft To Do

Office 365 users looking for simplicity

4.3/5 · Free plan

Let's be honest: sometimes OmniFocus is just overkill. Microsoft To Do (the spiritual successor to Wunderlist) is free and simple. The 'My Day' feature is genius in its simplicity: every morning you start with a clean slate and choose what you're doing today. This prevents the 'task hoarding' that OmniFocus users often suffer from (databases with 500+ tasks you never do). It lacks tags, complex repeats, and perspectives. But if you work in a Microsoft environment, the integration with Outlook and Teams is a breath of fresh air compared to the workarounds you need for OmniFocus.

Difference from OmniFocus: The 'My Day' view clears your focus list every day

Choose this if: want to work free and deeply integrated with Windows

What I like

  • Completely free for Microsoft 365 users
  • Outlook tasks sync directly (no scripts needed)
  • Much more accessible to get started with

What I like less

  • Too simple for real GTD (no project/context matrix)
  • No start-dates, which makes planning difficult

Linear

Developers and designers who find OmniFocus too slow

4.5/5 · Free plan · From $ 8/mo

Linear is actually intended for software teams, but many tech-savvy OmniFocus users switch over for their personal tasks. Why? Speed. Linear is ridiculously fast and completely keyboard-driven. It forces you into an 'issue tracking' mindset instead of a GTD mindset, which can be refreshing. Tasks are 'issues', projects are 'cycles'. It looks beautiful and the 'sync engine' is flawless. But beware: it's not made for your shopping list. Use this for your work projects, and keep your personal stuff somewhere else.

Difference from OmniFocus: Issue-tracker mentality instead of to-do list

Choose this if: speed and keyboard-shortcuts are your highest priority

What I like

  • Unmatched speed and performance
  • Best keyboard-navigation on the market
  • Free version is very generous for solo-use

What I like less

  • Not suitable for simple personal tasks (groceries)
  • Terminology (issues, cycles) is geared toward software builders

Remember The Milk

Linux/Windows users who need Smart Lists

0.0/5 · Free plan · From $ 4.17/mo

The old veteran who refuses to die. Remember The Milk (RTM) is most similar in philosophy to OmniFocus: it's a task database with extremely powerful 'Smart Lists' (their version of Perspectives). You can build queries here that blow your mind. The interface looks like it's from 2010, and that's the biggest stumbling block. But under that ugly hood lies an engine that's just as powerful as OmniFocus, but completely cross-platform. If you're leaving OmniFocus because of the Apple lock-in, but want to keep the power-features, this is your best bet.

Difference from OmniFocus: Smart Lists support very complex logical queries

Choose this if: functionality over appearance

What I like

  • Smart Add syntax is faster than OmniFocus
  • Works on literally every platform (even Linux and BlackBerry)
  • Very reliable sync, rarely conflicts

What I like less

  • Interface is painfully outdated
  • No hierarchical sub-projects like in OmniFocus

Obsidian

Tinkerers who want to merge notes and tasks

4.6/5 · Free plan · From $ 4/mo

Obsidian is not a task manager, it's a knowledge base. But with the 'Tasks' plugin, many ex-OmniFocus users build their own system. The big advantage is context: your task lives in the middle of your project notes, not in a separate database. You own your data (local Markdown files). The downside is that you're the mechanic yourself. OmniFocus works 'out of the box', Obsidian is a box of LEGO. If you don't like configuring plugins and tweaking CSS, stay far away from this. But for the ultimate control freak, this is the final destination.

Difference from OmniFocus: Tasks live in your notes, not in a separate list

Choose this if: want complete control over your data structure

What I like

  • Completely free for personal use
  • You build your own workflow, not locked into GTD
  • Future-proof through open file format

What I like less

  • Mobile experience is much less streamlined than OmniFocus
  • Requires a lot of configuration time (installing plugins)

Superlist

Users who miss Wunderlist and want something modern

3.9/5 · Free plan · From $ 5/mo

Superlist comes from the makers of Wunderlist and tries to bridge the gap between tasks and notes. It feels more modern than OmniFocus and less sterile. You can switch between a personal to-do list and team projects. The interface is fresh, with a focus on 'today'. It still lacks the depth of OmniFocus (no review perspective, limited filtering), but for those who find OmniFocus too 'corporate' and heavy, this is a breath of fresh air. It's still young, so expect a bug or missing feature here and there, but the potential is enormous.

Difference from OmniFocus: Hybrid between task list and simple documents

Choose this if: want a modern UI and need collaboration

What I like

  • Separation between work and personal is cleverly designed
  • Integrations with tools like GitHub and Slack are modern
  • Free version is very usable for individuals

What I like less

  • Not yet as feature-rich as the established order
  • App speed can sometimes be disappointing
Quick verdict

Compare the 12 best OmniFocus alternatives. From free to premium: discover which tool suits you best.

For whom is OmniFocus the best choice?

If you’re completely in the Apple ecosystem and GTD (Getting Things Done) isn’t just a method but a life philosophy, then OmniFocus is still the gold standard. The tool is built for people who process 50+ tasks daily, with multiple projects that have complex dependencies. Think of project managers working on 8 different client projects, or consultants who need separate contexts, perspectives, and review cycles for each project.

Also, if you’re someone who really wants control over every detail of your system, then you pay for that flexibility. OmniFocus allows you to build perspectives that show exactly what you want to see: all tasks with tag “waiting-for” that have been open for more than a week, sorted by project and filtered by energy level. You won’t find that level of customizability anywhere else.

And honestly? If you already have a MacBook, iPad, and iPhone, and you mainly work solo on your own projects, then the price is less painful. You pay one time for the apps, no subscription. For someone who uses their system for years without hassle about cross-platform or collaboration, that can be worth the investment.

Why would you look for an OmniFocus alternative?

The Apple Tax is the biggest problem. As soon as you have even one Windows laptop or Android phone in your life, you’re excluded. Do you work together with a partner who works on Windows? No OmniFocus for you. Want to check your tasks at the office on a Windows machine? Too bad. You’re literally forced to buy expensive Apple hardware for every device on which you want to see your task list. That just feels outdated in 2024.

Then there’s the complexity fatigue. OmniFocus gives you so many options that you can spend hours tinkering with your perfect system. Building perspectives, combining tags, setting up review cycles, understanding defer dates versus due dates. For some, that’s delightful, but for many it becomes a second job. You spend more time maintaining your system than actually checking off tasks. You especially notice this when you haven’t been actively working with it for a few weeks: then you’re facing a mountain of unorganized tasks and have to clean up first before you can be productive again.

And collaboration? Forget it. OmniFocus is built as a solo tool. As soon as you want to share tasks with your partner, teammate, or assistant, you hit a wall. You can’t delegate a project, keep a shared list, or assign tasks. For freelancers working with a VA or couples managing their household together, that’s a dealbreaker.

In conclusion

Are you an Apple purist but want less complexity? Things 3 gives you that beautiful design without the overwhelming options. Are you working on a mix of Windows and Apple? Todoist is the most reliable cross-platform option. For productivity nerds who want to build their own system but don’t want to be locked into Apple: Amazing Marvin offers even more customization options. Students and freelancers on a tight budget will find surprisingly robust functionality in TickTick for a fraction of the price. And small teams that want to apply GTD together? Nozbe is specifically built for that.

Personally, I’d go with Things 3 if I’m fully on Apple and just want my system to work without hassle. Or Todoist if I use even one non-Apple device. But it really depends on how much time you want to invest in your system versus how much time you want to spend actually getting things done.

Frequently asked questions

Can I export my OmniFocus database to Todoist?

Not directly. OmniFocus exports to CSV, but the structure is complex. You'll often need to use scripts (via Omni Automation) or intermediate steps via tools like Excel to get your data cleanly into Todoist.

Which alternative has the best 'Review' feature like OmniFocus?

Amazing Marvin and Things 3 come closest. Amazing Marvin has a specific 'Review' strategy that you can enable. Things 3 enforces it less, but has a clear workflow to check 'Upcoming' tasks weekly.

Is there an OmniFocus alternative that is a one-time purchase?

Yes, Things 3 is the most well-known. You pay per platform (Mac, iPad, iPhone) one time. There is no monthly subscription, unlike most competitors like Todoist or TickTick.

Does OmniFocus Web work well enough to switch to Windows?

Honestly: no. The web version of OmniFocus is a 'companion', not a full replacement. It's slower, lacks keyboard shortcuts and offline support. If you work full-time on Windows, you're better off with Todoist or TickTick.